Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Changingfilm22/Archive

29 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Damon.S.H.Journalist began editing Till We Meet Again (2015 film) and participating in the AfD discussion nearly immediately after account creation. Till We Meet Again (2015 film) was created by User:Changingfilm22 and BOTH users have removed the AfD template from the article. I believe User:Damon.S.H.Journalist is a sock being used to vote-stack the AfD. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   19:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Dear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Non-dropframe, It is true in our collective at our office we are many journalists and using the same computer to work on articles and also contributing to Wikipedia, it is true I did ask my collegue to take a look at one article objectivly that I had contributed too to see if he could make sence out of it without being biased. I did ask for him since he is interested in contributing to wikipedia to create his own acount name. I appologize if I by doing so have diregarded any rules regarding multiple account or colboration that is not proper to wikipedia standard, I will not deny the occurance or event. Sole our purpose of journalist is to objectivly report correct information and contributing to wikipedia is a hoby we recently began both of us. We are two different people but we did not try to cheat the system in anyway. Please remove comments from Damon.S.H.Journalist that interfere with the rules. Changingfilm22 (talk) 19:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Changingfilm22

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yes, you did break the rule. WP:COWORKER says that two related persons (like co-workers) working on the same subject should declare their connection on both their user pages and in the discussions they participate in. You have not done that. I strongly advise you to do that immediately, otherwise you may be regarded as two accounts belonging to the same person and blocked.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * For what it is worth, the technical evidence supports the assertion that Changingfilm22 makes above. Tiptoety  talk 07:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged both their userpages with the "shared IP" tag. They have not edited since this SPI was started. Closing now.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

04 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No answer received from the filler after 19 days. Closing this case with no action.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)