Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chaosname/Archive

11 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

The userpage has the sockpuppeteer's name and also this user has been blocked in sockpuppeteeing in another account. Shriram (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked. Elockid  ( Talk ) 15:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

18 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Self-confession to be the sock of on his own talk pagee (AMEN!). Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for double-checking. Cheers! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 19:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * That's not a very smart sock. -- Σ talkcontribs 20:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Tell me about it... and Oktoberfest is still three months away. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 20:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, plus. TN X Man 17:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked/tagged. — G FOLEY   F OUR!  — 18:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

30 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edit warring the same amendment to English people as User:Germanlight (banned sock of User:Chaosname, in same way, no discussion etc., continuing to edit-war same revert after coming off 3RR block. See these AN3 reports: and  DeCausa (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The last word in this user's name is one of Chaosname's sock's backwards: User:Saveliy, reversed becomes yilevas. Additionally, User:Volykr yilevas has edited disruptively at English people which was also targeted by a Chaosname sock, User:Germanlight. DeCausa (talk) 23:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Both socks are blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK, but I'll endorse for a sleeper check. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

✅ as Chaosname:



One underlying IP range blocked. –MuZemike 23:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)


 * English people has now been full-protected for 3 days due to the excessive socking. –MuZemike 00:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

02 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Admits to it here and here &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Assenge is ✅, along with. TN X Man 16:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I just indeffed another puppet, User:Frenchmilitary42, which added around a dozen attack pages in 3 minutes. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Add to that, , , and . Is a rangeblock possible? Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * All ✅. I put down a short rangeblock, so we'll see how that goes. TN X Man  18:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

07 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar editing pattern (edit war without discussion) at English people to previous socks eg Germanlight. DeCausa (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Segano1 is a match.  TN X</b> Man  13:43, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

While I am possibly AGF here, that user needs to be told not to mark all is edits as minor, as is the case here; that is considered disruptive. –MuZemike 23:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The account hasn't edited in awhile, so this seems to have gone cold. Relist if things pick up again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

22 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I suspect that the two accounts and anonymous IP above are operated by the same individual, as they meet many of the signs of sockpuppetry. I also believe that the creation of these multiple accounts was not done in good faith but rather is being used abusively.

Lines of evidence:


 * The Coolbeard and XMAxox accounts are both brand new.
 * Both accounts were created within hours of each other.
 * Of all the millions of possible Wikipedia articles, both accounts chose to show up on the same War in Somalia (2009–) page (there are several such articles), which they have both almost exclusively focused on as single-purpose accounts.
 * Both accounts have been performing/reverting back to the same exact idiosyncratic edits first added by the 85.237.212.126 anonymous IP less than 72 hours earlier (c.f., , ).
 * Both accounts have used edit summaries from the start, including during their very first edits.
 * Both accounts have adopted an aggressive attitude from the start, as if the user(s) has a chip on their shoulder/a score to settle. For example, calling out other users in edit summaries, making ill-considered accusations of impropriety , reverting various established editors without hesitation , etc..
 * Both accounts believe in and have been pushing for the idiosyncratic notion that such a thing as the "Islamic Emirate of Somalia" exists (c.f. ). Note that an article of that name was actually deleted in the past specifically because notability for the topic could not be established.
 * Both accounts have betrayed an awareness of advanced website functions that few genuine newbies are likely to know. For example, the XMAxox account alluded to the Twinkle tool during his very first edit summary (c.f. ), which was also his very first edit.

Given the foregoing, I would appreciate if possible a Checkuser to confirm the relationship between the two accounts and the anonymous IP. Middayexpress (talk) 19:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are :
 * No comment on the IP. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All socks blocked and tagged; marking as closed. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 20:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All socks blocked and tagged; marking as closed. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 20:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All socks blocked and tagged; marking as closed. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 20:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

23 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Disruptive fairly new user with small number of edits. Made this edit with same POV as disruptive edits by Chaosname socks User:Germanlight and User:Deano545 to same article. Also has edited similar Russian-related articles as Chaosname socks have done. DeCausa (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
based on technical evidence. –MuZemike 01:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Behavoir doesn't match IMO. I think you have the wrong guy. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  18:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

11 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same editing style, same strange POV edits in the Russians article as the previously confirmed socks Nikolosa, Lionenause and Shanesterman. illythr (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've added another account in that I think may be connected, and I'm endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

✅ plus:



Underlying IP range blocked. –MuZemike 16:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

14 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User making the same edits as blocked sockpuppet User:Wolfnegative, including a rather juvenile attempt at (nsfw) vandalism on User:Maunus/Userpage/About me, which both accounts made. SudoGhost 08:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Also ✅ and blocked:



Swedes has already been full-protected for 3 months by another admin, I have full-protected Neo-Nazism for 1 week; I will full-protect more articles if need be. –MuZemike 22:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

After the sockpuppets Wolfnegative and Ducherboy where blocked an IP address 219.83.100.205 was used to remake a change to the article English people and article where Wolfnegative and Ducherboy were previously in uses  as a tag team. -- PBS (talk) 01:59, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've blocked that IP for two weeks. I'll also point out that that IP has been previously blocked as a proxy. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It still is, I've adjusted your block. WilliamH (talk) 03:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

25 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:Duck, adds the same text or reverts to a version with the same text as added by previous socks Jarkeld (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, . TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  13:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

16 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This user's edits were stopped by Edit Filter 439, and seem similar to 2 recently blocked socks of ChaosName - Workingfarmer87 and Runespace. Given that one of the accounts has admitted to over 30 autoconfimed accounts still not blocked, so the IP needs to be either blocked or searched for other likely socks, possibly both. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC) עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Alexandria   (talk)  16:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * , though proxies are being used. Courcelles 17:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Nawlin blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

20 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Self-admitted.  HurricaneFan 25  16:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Hardblocked 6 months. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 17:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

07 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See user contributions for last know sock User:Heonsi Edit warring on Mongolian People's Republic over the addition of Satellite state of the Soviet Union to infobox Darkness Shines (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Six months hardblocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * In addition, is ✅ to be the same as .  Amalthea  11:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

23 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edit warring, POV pushing at articles previously hit by other socks of parent. Calabe1992 02:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Rangeblock has now been issued, so this can be closed. Calabe1992 02:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Procedural decline of CU. We do not relate IPs to accounts. NativeForeigner Talk 02:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the IP for a week for being disruptive. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

13 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See User:Zloyvolsheb/Evidence for dozens of diffs comparing Ocnerosti's editing pattern with the disruptive edits of User:Ami Deutshe and other sockpuppets of User:Chaosname.

I have informed him of my SPI request. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 04:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

There's also the glaring similarity in the user's poor grasp of English in comparison to Chaosname &c., e.g. putting spaces before commas master sock sock sock sock sock user in question. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ocnerosti is a ✅ match to . TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  13:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 16:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

25 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It's pretty clear from behavioral evidence alone that this is the banned User:Chaosname, who had several socks edit war exactly the same way:
 * IP 95.199.142.156 (rm "federal")
 * IP 95.199.142.156 (rm "federal")
 * IP 95.199.147.60 (rm "federal")
 * Chaosname sock User:Ocnerosti (rm "federal")
 * Chaosname sock User:Ocnerosti (rm "federal")
 * Chaosname sock User:Ocnerosti (rm "federal")
 * Chaosname sock User:Ami Deutshe (rm "federal")
 * Chaosname sock User:Ami Deutshe (rm "federal")

He has been doing this with different socks for months. And these IP trace to the same Swedish IP provider as 190.202.87.134 and 81.226.235.202, both blocked in previous SPIs. I'm wondering if some kind of range block might be helpful. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Rangeblocked. --MuZemike 17:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

15 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Claimed to be sock of a banned user in a post to AN/I  Monty  <sub style="color:#A3BFBF;">845  01:21, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Now blocked. Previous SPI history at Sockpuppet investigations/Chaosname, sorry about the case sensitivity. Monty  <sub style="color:#A3BFBF;">845  01:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 14:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

14 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Newly registered user all of whose edits are dedicated to inserting "Germanic ethnic group" into the article on Swedes. Just like several of Chaosname's previous puppets. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 14:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ plus. I've blocked both accounts. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 23:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

27 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked and tagged by me. Adding for reference. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 18:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

28 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Self-confessed sockpuppet of "banned user", per this diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=557144448&oldid=557142624 The ANI page linked to by the above diff also has evidence of disruptive editing.

Since editor has threatened to use a new sockpuppet account, it seems appropriate to check for sleepers. Boson (talk) 09:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I've blocked the admitted sockpuppet. Endorsing for checkuser given the threat of creating more sockpuppets. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at their most recent ranges, it doesn't appear that any new accounts have been created. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ / Join WER 23:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

04 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This IP's is to open a request for comment on Nazi Germany regarding the question of the motto. This IP geolocates to the known location of the banned user Chaosname. Thanks. Dianna (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC) by the same user from the same range. The IP admitted to being User:Peterzor and Peterzor to being a sock of Chaosname. -- Dianna (talk) 19:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Now he is editing from 95.199.12.195. I have to go out now; will check back later -- Dianna (talk) 19:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Special:AbuseFilter/561 set up, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

05 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

As former incarnation as said he would come back as another new sock puppet account. Similar editing patterns as :
 * Same inability to use a shift key
 * Fixated on the Soviet Union info box and being Peterzor's preferred version
 * Similar weird chaining of self reverts by Beetsyres34:
 * 06:36, 4 June 2013 . . (-2)‎ . . m User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * 06:35, 4 June 2013 . . (+2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎ (Undid revision 558246624 by Beetsyres34 (talk))
 * 06:34, 4 June 2013 . . (-2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * 06:34, 4 June 2013 . . (+2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * and
 * 19:01, 5 May 2013 . . (+3)‎ . . 2012–13 Liga MX season ‎ (Undid revision 553666851 by Beetsyres34 (talk))
 * 19:00, 5 May 2013 . . (-3)‎ . . 2012–13 Liga MX season ‎ (Undid revision 553666774 by Beetsyres34 (talk))
 * 18:59, 5 May 2013 . . (+3)‎ . . 2012–13 Liga MX season ‎ (Undid revision 553666678 by Beetsyres34 (talk))
 * 18:59, 5 May 2013 . . (-3)‎ . . 2012–13 Liga MX season ‎ (Undid revision 553666601 by 189.163.109.89 (talk))
 * compared with Peterzor
 * 18:11, 27 May 2013 . . (+2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * 18:09, 27 May 2013 . . (-2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * 18:09, 27 May 2013 . . (+2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * 18:09, 27 May 2013 . . (-2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎
 * 18:08, 27 May 2013 . . (+2)‎ . . User talk:AnonMoos ‎ (→‎new flag request)
 * and
 * 20:01, 21 May 2013 . . (+1)‎ . . User talk:Peterzor ‎ (Undid revision 556155072 by Peterzor (talk))
 * 20:01, 21 May 2013 . . (-1)‎ . . User talk:Peterzor ‎ (Undid revision 556155044 by Peterzor (talk))
 * 20:01, 21 May 2013 . . (+1)‎ . . User talk:Peterzor ‎ (Undid revision 556155020 by Peterzor (talk))
 * 20:00, 21 May 2013 . . (-1)‎ . . User talk:Peterzor ‎ (Undid revision 556154954 by Peterzor (talk))
 * 20:00, 21 May 2013 . . (+1)‎ . . User talk:Peterzor ‎ (Undid revision 556154919 by Peterzor (talk))

-- Nug (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Painfully obvious this is CN based off the last sock, I am interested however in the sock always posting to one talk page User:AnonMoos, makes me think meat, although I should dig deeper, and I will. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC) ‎

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ - no other socks (other than lots of logging out) that I can see - A l is o n  ❤ 10:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Rschen7754 10:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

08 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The IP geolocates to Chaosname's known location, and has visited the Talk:Nazi Germany page to request insertion of a motto in the info box. . Similar activity was pursued by recent sock User:Peterzor -, and an IP he used from a different range -. -- Dianna (talk) 22:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Added to Special:AbuseFilter/561, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

09 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The IP geolocates to Chaosname's known location, and has visited the Talk:Nazi Germany page to start an RFC about a motto for the info box: Talk:Nazi Germany He did similar edits with his last IP 2.68.175.159 and his most recent named sock User:Peterzor - , and an IP he used from a different range -. -- Diannaa (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Fairly clear cut. Same MO entirely. I blocked the static IP for a while longer despite their inactivity, but the dynamic hasn't been edited from again and is dynamic, hence I"m keeping it unblocked. NativeForeigner Talk 20:37, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

15 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (already blocked, adding for archive reasons)
 * (already blocked, adding for archive reasons)
 * (already blocked, adding for archive reasons)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Repeated nazi motto edits, from similar IP. (See aug 2013 SPI for same edits from similar IPs)Sockpuppet_investigations/Chaosname/ArchiveGaijin42 (talk) 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nazi_Germany&oldid=80553796
 * that motto has been around since 10 october 2006 thats 7 years so it was not ''original research as you noted 83.180.191.14 (talk) 19:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

''
 * old original research is still original research. What source is used to say it is the motto? Favonian Another one for you! Rangeblock? Gaijin42 (talk) 20:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Quite WP:DUCKy. I've blocked the second IP, which showed recent activity. Favonian (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing. The IP was blocked a while ago, and his block has since expired. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

29 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The sock is edit warring over the same pic that Chaosname had edit warred over on the Mafia state article, the sock has also used the following IP's before logging in to edit war, he finished the edit war with the Relimandere22 account. 90.129.84.220 90.129.64.112 Darkness Shines (talk) 23:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - ; no justification for CU Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 01:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

17 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Chaosname's confirmed sockpuppet editwarred the Soviet Union inbox over the "successor",,,,.

also editwarred over "successor" in the infobox ,,,

seems to have knowledge not attributable to an editor with only 33 edits to initiate an RFC on the Soviet Union talkpage.

An IP that geolocates to Chaosname's known location also opened an rfc on the Vladimir Putin talkpage on 9 Nov, which resulted in removal of text from the lede. This text was recently added back in, who never edited this article before then removes this text and also removes a recent comment from the now closed RFC that was opened by this IP that geolocates to Chaosname's known location.

Note that reverts at Soviet Union developed into a distinct pattern involving, an account with the apparent single purpose of reverting that was only created  after Kalix94 started reverting the info-box:
 * 17:06, 5 January 2014‎ Kalix94 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,761 bytes) (-8)‎ . . (rv the original wording was better) (undo | thank)
 * 03:12, 5 January 2014‎ Mankiw2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,769 bytes) (+12)‎ . . (undo | thank)
 * 03:10, 5 January 2014‎ Mankiw2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,757 bytes) (+751)‎ . . (Undid revision 589203844 by Nug (talk)) (undo | thank)


 * 16:18, 2 January 2014‎ Kalix94 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,775 bytes) (-12)‎ . . (undo | thank)
 * 09:54, 2 January 2014‎ Mankiw2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,787 bytes) (+12)‎ . . (undo | thank)
 * 09:52, 2 January 2014‎ Mankiw2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,775 bytes) (-230)‎ . . (Undid revision 588789920 by Nug (talk)) (undo | thank)

So Mankiw2 is likely Chaosname's puppet too. Nug (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 15:36, 22 December 2013‎ Kalix94 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (130,876 bytes) (-12)‎ . . (undo | thank)
 * 14:54, 22 December 2013‎ Mankiw2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (130,888 bytes) (-343)‎ . . (undo | thank)
 * 14:43, 22 December 2013‎ Mankiw2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (131,231 bytes) (+244)‎ . . (Undid revision 587205891 by Nug (talk)) (undo | thank)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, I have no comment on the rest of the report at this point, but the part about the Putin article and the RfC is backwards. User:Tataral added the information back to the Putin article against the RfC closure, and Kalix reverted. Tataral also modifed the closure on the talk page, and Kalix reverted. See this discussion at WP:ANI.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The edit wars over the infobox involve different material. I see the pattern between the two accounts at Soviet Union, but the edits seem largely disconnected other than the timing. I can't see how it advances their "cause"; one account could have just made consecutive edits. One strange thing that intrigues me. User:Relimandere22 is the last account to be blocked - not confirmed but based on duck. That account was created on October 23, 2013, at 17:05 UTC. It was blocked on October 29, 2013. Kalik created their account on October 23, 2013, at 17:00 UTC, five minutes earlier. Even more oddly, they didn't edit with the account until December 12. I'm not sure what that means, either. It would have made more sense for Kalik to start editing after Relimandere was blocked rather than waiting about a month and a half. At the same time, I find all of this behavior disruptive - and particularly Kalix's edits indicative of socking even if it's not this master - and with an obvious intersection of interests. Based on that, I'm endorsing a CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There is still a lot of logged-out editing going on. Kalix94 and the following are ✅ to :
 * Mankiw2 is editing from eight time zones away. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeffed and tagged confirmed socks and closing.
 * Mankiw2 is editing from eight time zones away. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeffed and tagged confirmed socks and closing.

19 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First came upon, which reminded me of by blocked sock. Egyptian certainly has an interest in the same subjects as Chaosname, for instance Nazism, Russia, China. As an example, look at this comparison between Egyptian and Peterzor, as well as Egyptians vs. Ionchari. All in all, there's a sufficiently strong case for me to block Egyptian as a duck, but having looked at the archive of previous case, I'm requesting CU to ferret out possible sleepers. Favonian (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to Egyptian445 and and a crap ton of IP editing + proxies. I'll lay some blocks soon. --  DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  23:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you! All blocked and tagged, so I'll close the case. Favonian (talk) 06:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account is already linked behaviourally to Sockpuppet investigations/Hiyob346, but they have requested a review of their block. On further review, their appeal casts doubt on the connection to Hiyob346, but I have uncovered evidence that they are connected to this case:
 * is the most recent CU-confirmed Chaosname sock, they were blocked 19 June 2014 after making this edit removing Fascism, German Nationalism and Antisemitism from an infobox at Nazi Party, with the edit summary.
 * Dannis243 appeared 20 June 2014, waited 5 days and then made 10 inconsequential edits to their own talk page to gain autoconfirmed status, blanked the page, then immediately removed German Nationalism and Antisemitism from the same infobox, with the edit summary . They continued edit-warring to remove those wikilinks, complaining about these "seperate ideologies" [sic] in their edit summaries.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * re-tagging based on new evidence. No action is required here; closing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)