Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chelston-temp-1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)




 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blanking of AfD's involving User:Solumeiras, a confirmed sock of Sunholm DuncanHill (talk) 09:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Probably related to another recently blocked account - one of the pages they blanked is Requests for checkuser/Case/TheM62Manchester, which links to the same account as the user page of Chelston-temp-1. Chelston-temp-1 also created an alternative account Chelston-SXW-Account. Peter James (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - per filer. The accounts are clearly related to each other in some way, but please confirm and look for sleepers. Thanks. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 09:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Everyone appears blocked. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * to clarify, the three are confirmed to one another (plus some already-blocked sleepers), and we don't know about their relationship to the master? --Blablubbs&#124;talk 12:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Plus, yes. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 01:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm not sufficiently convinced of this being Sunholm to tag as such, especially since there are claims of off-wiki coordination here . Also noting that Robeca is blocked on cawiki for vandalism – we should probably consider locks if xwiki-disruption continues. Moved to oldest confirmed,, closing. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 12:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Similar username pattern as the master
 * acknowledges prior accounts, vs. e.g.
 * Intervenes in projectspace, supposedly on behalf of long-gone users; past socks blanked stoneage noticeboard archives and arbcom cases based on claims of reddit posts and other off-wiki information (see e.g. ); this one instead appeals on behalf of others based on claims of off-wiki information, again specifically referencing reddit:  --Blablubbs (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Well, I am not those accounts linked to... but I was around years ago, just not so much active on here. That's why I am in projectspace. --Kathanis92595 (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - it's not identical behaviour, but I believe there are strong similarities, and certainly enough to justify a check. Please compare to past socks and look for others. Thanks. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Ask me off-wiki about a strong technical hint I found which supports this. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Chelston-temp-1:
 * Kathanis92595
 * Robeca5020 was on a web host, but the technical data matches. If desired, the case could be merged or renamed or whatever. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow, this is weird. Behaviorally, User:Chelston-temp-1, Sobienir56, and Kathanis92595 are all up to no good, but in different ways.  Is it possible this is three different people who are all using proxies with a common exit point or something like that which gives deceptive CU data? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @NinjaRobotPirate just to make sure I've got it right, Chelston-temp-1, Sobienir56, and Kathanis92595 are all confirmed to each other, but not to Robeca5020? In any case, I've looked at the behavioral data more closely, and I'm now convinced that my "this is weird" comment above was not justified.  The same beans I mentioned in my first comment applies here, and Draft:/r/legaladvice clearly ties Chelston-temp-1 back to the reddit theme. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Robeca5020 is the only one on a web host. It's probably one Reddit user screwing around, but it could also be different people.  If you're trying to force me to speak through templates, Robeca5020 is . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. I think I've obsessed over this enough, closing :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the behavioural connection between these two groups is rather strong, so I tweaked the tags in the archive and for the unlocked ones. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the behavioural connection between these two groups is rather strong, so I tweaked the tags in the archive and for the unlocked ones. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Pro forma, per checkuser. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed to each other, and otherwise belonging with this case. FlitzMyex is the oldest here, and like PublicUserAccount0084, may or may not be compromised. Whatever, this is an old LTA. No tags or rename needed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)