Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chensiyuan/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
The master's first revert had no context for removal, following which the reverts were exhausted and any further revert would have been a violation of the 3RR. The suspected sock account with no history prior to my edit, the masters edit or this event, was created and reverted my addition again without any context for removal.

Both accounts seem to have been conducting housekeeping and undertaking good faith edits to the page as it was evidenced even after my edit was reverted. My repeated requests to take the discussion to the talk page were neglected and the suspected sock appeared at that period of time to revert the edit. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 14:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * - They do look like the same user, and the sequence of events in Moot court make me think the second account could have been created for to game 3RR or similar. MarioGom (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. Blocking the master for 2 weeks and indeffing the sock. Any more sockpuppet shenanigans should probably see the master indeffed - this isn’t a tenuous technical connection.  firefly  ( t · c ) 20:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)