Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chiyamz/Archive

17 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Passes duck test based on edits to Anne Curtis article. The usernames also give way, too. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - If it's DUCK, then there's no need for CU. Aside from that, I'm not seeing much evidence to deceive/evade by socking. There's no overlap between the editors, and is likely to be a "forgot my username" situation. ( X! ·  talk )  · @220  · 04:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I am failing to see any real abuse. Instead I see a new editor who doesn't really know what they are doing and likely forgot their password/username and just created a second account. Additionally, blocked  on the 17th of December and  hasn't edited since the 14th. As such, I am closing this case with  taken.  Tiptoety  talk 05:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)