Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Choowiki/Archive

Evidence submitted by Valpoalumedu
Choowiki for the first time gained an account and logged on three days ago and immediately began to edit more than three edits per day and attempted to revert and delete the Craig McKenzie article which has existed since 2008. Choowiki has no other offerings to Wikipidea and from the very beginning of its contribution its motive seems to be to banish the article with countless edits to it and it alone within its three days of opening an account. Yworo stepped in as well and what I believe amounts to some collusion continued Afd which is fair for any lacking article but then he/she edited over other independent editors after they tried to better the article Craig McKenzie. The article is in Afd maybe for probable reason but it should not be allowed to be over edited when edits are done in good faith for truth, facts and verification; but of course this is being done but Choowiki and Yworo who are trying to banish any good edit for their personal warring. If the the article does not pass muster for wiki-standard then this is fine delete it but it should be allowed to be improved and the wiki community should have its say with good faith edits and research in time. No one or two persons shall be allowed to determine the notability of an article or whether it should stay or go. And no on or two person can make an article out to be an impostor. I suspect that Choowiki joined Wikipedia and is simply out as a single purpose account to destroy the article for a lack of personal taste of the subject. I intend to contribute to all of our alumni on wikipedia and propose others candidates. I would like to protect any article of a Valpo alumnus who has served the university well and this young man has done just that and the article is not so blatantly "unnotable" as Choowiki or Yworo claim. This is up to good debate. The article deserves to be left in as best shape as possible which is what I attempted in good faith today and in good faith with two other editors not counting Choowiki and Yworo. We should leave it as well as possible and let the wiki-community decide. (Valpoalumedu (talk) 00:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC))

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
 * This claim is not relevant to me. I am a Wikipedia newbie who intends to contribute more to the community. I have not created multiple accounts or have acted on behalf of others or have created an another account expressly to move the issue forward. I felt this article did not meet the stated criteria and standards. I followed the process created by Wikipedia (suggested improvements, then recommended for deletion). This does not make me a sockpuppet. Choowiki (talk) 01:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Revenge report following WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Basketnews, no evidence that the two accounts named above are the same. While it is interesting how quickly Choowiki happened to be caught up in a rather large WP:SOCK case, and is really only interested in this one article,, so there is nothing to do here. Amalthea 14:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)