Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Choronzonclub/Archive

14 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The user Stealthepiscopalian was blocked for sockpuppeting by administrator John in 21:54, 24 February 2016. He was found to be mastering an IP 2001:468:d01:92:944f:5b59:136a:9bed. All the action took place at the Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica article. Now, as the article has been nominated for AfD, and where the deletion has gained univocal support, a new editor called D1s0b3y have popped up all of a sudden. The editor has only been editing around the very topic (+10 edits). D1s0b3y himself reported that he had "...just signed up about an hour ago...", and taking into account his sole purpose to emerge and defend an article nominated for deletion, it seems quite obvius that we are dealing with a sockpuppet here. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

My wife and I share an IP, this is in no way prohibited by Wikipedia policy. I am not sure why I am the continued target of harrassment by Jayaguru-Shishya, which is in fact a violation of Wikipedia policy. Stealthepiscopalian (talk Stealthepiscopalian 22:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Stealthepiscopalian

For what it's worth I am not D1s0b3y, nor do I have the slightest clue who they are, and their IP should not in any way connect to any of mine. If this is being claimed it is a bald-faced lie. Stealthepiscopalian (talk Stealthepiscopalian 22:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Stealthepiscopalian

Jayaguru-Shishya, I am not anyones sockpuppet. Perhaps you should ask why there was all the sudden buzz around the saints of EGC article. In a group on Facebook it was mentioned that it seemed the article was going to be deleted. Having been a user of the website for years (not a member though), I figured I'd sign up and get started. I've not even been registered on the site for more than 12 hours and I'm considered being banned because my first interaction was defending a page? I have only edited few things because I've only had a few hours on the website. "Taking into account my sole purpose to emerge" is to defend an article nominated for deletion. that's not my sole purpose to join the site, it's just the first thing I did. I'm being credited for trolling the admin pages? maybe it has something to do with the fact that I've not even been on the site 12 hours and already being blamed as a sockpuppet? I don't understand why I am being targeted. D1s0b3y (talk) 04:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those two.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅, blocked and tagged:
 * is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action taken towards D1s0b3y and the stale IP. Mike V • Talk 16:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action taken towards D1s0b3y and the stale IP. Mike V • Talk 16:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)