Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chrett/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
They admit it and use it to their advantage in "the call of the wild" article (see page history) AlexBobCharles (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

For context, the edit appears to be referring to is, in which , a disclosed alternate account of , reinstated an edit of Chrett that was undone. This was because Chrett's original edit broke template syntax, which Wikiflation fixed. There was only one revert on each side so this doesn't seem to be a case of using an alternate account to gain an advantage in an edit war. RedPanda25 23:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * This is correct, thank you.
 * Nothing that I'm doing on Wikipedia is controversial or trying to push any agenda. I've made >1,400 minor edits using Template:Inflation to make Wikipedia more informative and maintainable.
 * I'm a new user, and I'm following the rules as best I can. Chrett (talk) 23:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * No evidence presented of inappropriate use of alternate accounts. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)