Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cibbba/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar edit behavior on. The account is recently created to evade sanctions imposed on these 4 blocked IPs. 222.167.166.187 (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
We don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * All IPs here are blocked as proxies, so no blocks potentially being evaded even if these are the same person. Closing. ~ Rob 13 Talk 00:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

At first brush this looks pretty clear cut. This account appears to have been registered to continue the behaviour for which Cibba was blocked. Diff 1, Diff 2. What gives me pause here is that another editor who I believe to be distinct from Cibba has also made this edit. Diff 3, SPI. Please check to confirm. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''



Twofortnights undid Cibbba's revision at 17:18, 29 November 2017 Diff 4. At 02:15, 30 November 2017, Jekeme asked for explanation in Twofortnights's talk page Diff 5. Jekeme appears to be Cibbba's sock. Please check to confirm. 222.167.166.187 (talk) 03:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing my own request. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you want to run this? Sir Sputnik mentions in the third diff Williamluk atletico, which you already checked at Sockpuppet investigations/Williamluk atletico.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I can, but it will likely need to wait until Saturday. ~ Rob 13 Talk 00:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * for Hicablevanz. The potential sock is editing from behind a proxy. I'm not seeing enough to check Jekeme. Simply asking about an edit, especially one that multiple editors appear to be making, is not enough for a check. ~ Rob 13 Talk 12:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * - The use of proxies is consistent with sockpuppetry from Cibba, given that the account appears to have been registered to get around a number of proxy blocks (see archive). Please block Hicablevanz indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~ Rob 13 Talk 00:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

  222.167.166.126 (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Please move this page to the WP space. Thanks. Regards, 222.167.166.126 (talk) 17:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - First of all, please lay off Williamluk atletico. You've accused them of sockpuppetry twice already with no action taken on either accusation. You've presented no meaningful new evidence against them here, so this is beginning to border on a personal attack. As for the others, Hicablevanz was previously checked and found to be using proxies, so another check is unlikely to reveal anything useful.
 * - That being said, Hicablevanz and Cceobus do appear to be the same person. Cceobus' only action has been to undo the reversion of Hicablevanz's most recent edit. What clearly happened here is that given the size of the edit they were restoring, they found it easier to rollback everything, and then re-add the one edit since the reversion of Hicablevanz's edit, which is why I don't put much stock in the overlap with Williamluk atletico. Please block the new sock indefinitely. Could an admin clerk please merge this into Sockpuppet investigations/Cibbba? Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Cceobus blocked. Ben   Mac  Dui  17:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * According to the master's user page and CU logs, this case belongs at Sockpuppet investigations/Cibbba. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Case moved, closing. GABgab 22:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ceocc's username and list of local accounts in global account information are similar to Cceobus. Cceobus edited Visa requirements for British Nationals (Overseas) and Ceocc edited the same article on zh-wiki.

Jekeme's list of local accounts in global account information is similar to Cceobus. Twofortnights undid sockmaster Cibbba's revision at 17:18, 29 November 2017 Diff 1. At 02:15, 30 November 2017, Jekeme asked for explanation in Twofortnights's talk page Diff 2. 222.167.166.126 (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ceocc hasn't actually edited here. As such, the accounts registration on enwiki is likely a result of the unified login rather than any actual attempt to edit the 'pedia. For now, I see no need to block the account, even if turns out to be the same person. With regards to Jekeme, no new evidence has been presented since this report was filed. Closing without action. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)