Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Civility Enforcer/Archive

Evidence submitted by Nev1
The edits of are suspicious for a newly registered account. The first two edits were to create a user and user talk page; it then proceeded to post a thread at ANI which was subsequently closed as unconstructive. These do not seem like the actions of a new user, and the reason given for blocking the account was that it was a suspected sock puppet. While the account has been blocked, I think it would be worthwhile to find out if there are any other accounts associated with Civility Enforcer. Nev1 (talk) 11:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Nev1 (talk) 11:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC) This looks like another user and the checkuser will likely determine which one. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * More specifically, (recently blocked as a sock of ) as the one ANI edit has him squarely fixated on Parrot of Doom's and Malleus Fatuorum's talk pages as well as the Talk:Wife selling page. –MuZemike 14:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * That's extremely tenuous and doesn't take into account any of Fred the Oyster's behaviour. As someone who is familiar with the WebHamster and Fred the Oyster accounts, in my opinion a connection with is very unlikely. Fred the Oyster always seemed to get on with both Malleus Fatuorum and Parrot of Doom, and would certainly not consider himself a "civility enforcer". Nev1 (talk) 16:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * extremely unlikely. I had a good working relationship with Fred. Parrot of Doom 18:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

per the above two comments. If Nev1 and Parrot of Doom are convinced that this is not WebHamster. Then we have nothing to go on, and this CU request hence becomes a fishing request. –MuZemike 18:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I ran this anyway, before you declined it. I find very strong connections (enough for a ✅ on all of them) between:
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who the master is, however. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Aww, snap! Well, anyways, we have an established sockmaster, now. –MuZemike 19:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Bubba hotep

 * Submitted duplicate report to ANI two months after event.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Blocked as sock. – B.hotep •talk• 22:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)