Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cjxxi/Archive

18 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

basically a duck on DREAM Act and Talk:DREAM Act, but a checkuser might clarify whether an indefinite block is warranted. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 10:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Not sure about the Master, but the 3 IPs are linked. Two were already blocked for edit warring, I've upped it to 2 weeks for all IPs for block evasion. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  01:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * - to check for block evasion. Agree that it appears there is. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  15:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * because CUs may not disclose a connection between named accounts and IPs. This case will have to be considered on behavioral evidence only. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  16:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing ⋙–Berean–Hun<b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b>  15:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)