Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cláudio César Dias Baptista/Archive

09 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Repeated edits on Cláudio César Dias Baptista and Géa from this IP range. On, IP says they are the article creator and are not Mr. Baptista. On, User: Cláudio César Dias Baptista says he is the article creator and a pupil of Mr. Baptista. Then on, Mr. Baptista himself writes as User: Cláudio César Dias Baptista. There are a lot more IPs, as they are dynamic. The same behaviour has occurred on the Portuguese Wikipedia, on the same articles. X X X antiuser eh? 23:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * A CU won't do much here for IPs. The ranges for these IPs - 187.13.0.0/17 and 187.14.96.0/19 - would cause enough collateral damage that I don't think we can block them. Having said that, I've protected the Claudio article, as well as the Rita Lee one. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

11 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User:Cláudio César Dias Baptista is using this sock plus some IPsocks on Articles for deletion/Cláudio César Dias Baptista and Articles for deletion/Géa. Note how the spelling idiosyncrasies and choice of words are quite similar, even though the sock's profile says they speak English and were born in Australia. Their other edits all pertain to the "William Shakespeare lexicon" debacle discussed at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents An IP check could quickly sort that out. X X X antiuser eh? 10:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two named accounts are ✅ matches, plus other consensus-faking shenanigans. TN X Man 13:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sock blocked indef, master one week. JohnCD (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

12 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Supporting Cláudio César Dias Baptista's claims on Articles for deletion/Cláudio César Dias Baptista and Articles for deletion/Géa. Most Ip's from same or slightly different range. CU to check if some might be Meats. Doh5678 (talk) 12:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Jcms1506br's comment is in the same wall-of-text style; Fabiopa's is more concise. I have added Likalileal, another new (concise) SPA. These may be just supporters - I suspect off-wiki canvassing is going on - but as there has been socking here I think a CU would be useful. JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * User:Likalileal looks legit. I think the IPs are Mr. Baptista, not sure about User:Fabiopa. X X X antiuser eh? 18:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . If this is the master continuing to evade, we may have to look at a longer block. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

No obvious sleepers, unfortunately. With the exception of, who is ❌, I would consider the others as sockpuppets, as although they geolocate to the same political entity, the IPs are hundreds of miles apart. Behavioral evidence may indicate meatpuppetry, however. -- Avi (talk) 01:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Archived due to the result of the checkuser which doesn't point to sockpuppetry, maybe meatpuppetry, but if issues re-arrise, ANI might be a good forum to take the issue, otherwise it can always be re-filed here. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  00:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

15 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The article Cláudio César Dias Baptista was submitted to AfC by. On the article talk page, IP 187.13.85.227 writes "I am the person who created the page Cláudio César Dias Baptista. I utilize the siglum "CCDB", but I am not the author Cláudio César Dias Baptista, whose initials are also "CCDB". I am just a reader of his books." But Ccdb is a SUL account, and on :pt his user page pt:Usuário:Ccdb says that he is Baptista and at pt:Discussão:Cláudio César Dias Baptista he writes as Baptista. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
endorsed by Steven Zhang, pending his comments once his mobile connection starts working properly SpitfireTally-ho! 23:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, thanks for that. I was in the City Loop, no cellular coverage. Archived previous case due to the result of the checkuser, but the issue can be taken to ANI if issues come up again. Endorsing this one just to double check if there are any other accounts we're not seeing. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  23:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Appears to be a match.  TN X Man  13:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * B/T'd sock. IP = 1 week, Master reset at 2 weeks. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  15:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I have blocked for 1 week as an admitted sock (here) and re-blocked CCDB for 3 weeks.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  18:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

17 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:Duck: this user has been caught socking three times since Articles for deletion/Cláudio César Dias Baptista and Articles for deletion/Géa went up for discussion, spelling idiosyncrasies and choice of words are quite similar and the IP's have cross-editted each other's posts here here and here. Sean (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm sorry, but checkuser does not generally disclose connections between IPs and named accounts. TN X Man 19:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I have blocked all three IP addresses for two weeks for block evasion and extended the block on the main account to indefinite.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:41, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN X Man  19:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

07 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same pattern of adding information about himself to articles related to Os Mutantes. X X X antiuser eh? 16:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked 1 week. Elockid  ( Talk ) 17:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)