Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ClaimJumperPete/Archive

Report date July 14 2009, 00:39 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by PMDrive1061


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by –  Sy  n 00:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * RFCU added based on PMDrives comment below. No comment on case. Recused.  Sy  n 00:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * is stale. Are there any more recent accounts that could be compared to for the purpose of a CheckUser?  Tiptoety  talk 21:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * - Based on this edit, CheckUser would be helpful simply to check if there are any more accounts associated with as it is more than obvious (as he admitted it) that John is a sock of Pete.  Tiptoety  talk 21:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Looks as if a long-lost idiot has returned, or at least an equally idiotic copycat. Blocked by another admin already, but if this is in fact the return of ClaimJumperPete, he is sure to have a sockpuppet farm in waiting or is coordinating a new offsite attack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PMDrive1061 (talk • contribs)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Comment: Another "long-lost" vandal showed up on my talk page today and I've initiated a RFCU on a possible PWeeHurman sock or meatpuppet.  One and the same with this account, perhaps?  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * ✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence indicates that the following accounts are related:
 * <-- Tagged as a sockmaster, likely itself a puppet of the larger farm.
 * <-- Tagged as a sockmaster, likely itself a puppet of the larger farm.
 * <-- Tagged as a sockmaster, likely itself a puppet of the larger farm.
 * <-- Tagged as a sockmaster, likely itself a puppet of the larger farm.
 * <-- Tagged as a sockmaster, likely itself a puppet of the larger farm.
 * <-- Tagged as a sockmaster, likely itself a puppet of the larger farm.

-- Avi (talk) 04:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 04:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

04 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Simply put, the sock clearly quacks. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: Since the sockpuppeteer was already a banned user at the time of the socking, I went ahead and added a CU request to flush out any sleepers. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 07:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked. RL0919 blocked the user originally - Tiptoety extended block parameters to disable account creation, e-mail and talk privileges. m.o.p 06:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * - I don't know if the CUs have any sort of info on this master; it looks like they were fairly prolific. Either way, I'll endorse for a sleeper check against the sock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Nothing else there. –MuZemike 21:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)