Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ClioSoftDM/Archive

29 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

edits are very similar, such as here suspected sock made edits and after the suspected main account was banned for promotional username, the suspected sock created the article and now removes speedy delete tag. GrayFullbuster (talk) 06:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . CheckUser isn't going to reveal anything more than what is obvious here. It's not particularly straight sockpuppetry anyway, ClioSoftDM was (quite rightly) blocked for a username violation. WilliamH (talk) 07:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally I would have issued a spamusername block on the original account, but since the blocking admin chose to give a username block, and told the user "Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username", there can be no possible objection to the fact that the user has done so. This case can now be closed. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:59, 29 November 2011 (UTC)