Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Clukowiak/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

similar name, exact same edits. FMSky (talk) 05:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.'''
 * Yep. Same focus on awards. Same falsification of focus on people's parents' names. Same use of "Template" as an edit summary. WP:DUCK.  for:
 * Indefinite block of OrsonWelles 2023 as a sockpuppet.
 * One-month block of ChristianWelles2022 for sockpuppeteering (on the long side since they have a recent one-week DE block and this socking is thus evasion of scrutiny), or just indef as WP:NOTHERE.
 * Courtesy ping to Bbb23 as the one who made the DE block. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 07:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I would prefer to block the master indefinitely and tag both accounts. Why block them as NOTHERE? And I think the tag for the puppet should be proven.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree on proven; just forgot to say that. As to block length, in terms of WP:SOCK I don't think an indef is appropriate for a first-offense non-block-evasion instance of relatively minor socking. As to NOTHERE, I'd misread some of the infobox diffs as giving the wrong names for people's parents; I apologize for the confusion. I do then stand by the call of indef for the puppet, a month for the master. But ultimately it's your (or any other admin's) call. All I can do is make a recommendation. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 15:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I've followed your recommendation, . In general, the clerk who disposes of the case makes the determinations as to block length, etc. Just because you're not an administrator, doesn't change that. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Both of these accounts appear to be evading an indefinite block on . Accordingly, I'm going to upgrade the block on to indefinite and reopen; I'll leave the rest to . --Blablubbs (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Playing around with gUser search, I also found . --Blablubbs (talk) 19:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The case should also be moved to the oldest account.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * also looks related. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ...as does . --Blablubbs (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Add to the list. I'd be inclined to request CU at this point. Spicy (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, blocked. @Tamzin: Are you still working on this case? I can finish it, if you prefer. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Blablubbs. I'm still here.  And thanks, Spicy.  per Spicy since we're at three rounds of blocks now (14 Sept., 29 Sept., today).  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 19:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The non-stale accounts are ✅: ChristianWelles2021, 2, 3 .. Georgewelles2021. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, zzuuzz. Renamed to oldest known sock. . Closing. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 22:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

similar nickname and constant "template" edit summaries like other sock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Georgewelles2021 FMSky (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This didn't need CU. Blocked and tagged. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)