Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coachbricewilliams28/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Articles for deletion/International Christian Church (2nd nomination) was created by Coachbricewilliams28, at 01:26, 2 January. They moved comments from the talk page -. The comments were two delete !votes, by accounts created at 02:38 and 02:41, commenting at 03:08 and 02:46 respectively, which indicates one account created, then the other, editing as the 2nd account, logging out and then editing as the first account. This corresponds to a hiatus in Coachbricewilliams28's activity - being the edit before their comment moving. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  18:43, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Sorry, I'm not sure what information you would require to determine that the other users aren't me and merely coincidental incidents prior to my moving of their comments from talk to open forum as I believed to be appropriate. If there is some backdoor way of determining someone's location or personal information feel free to use it. I'm open to a phone call as well if so desired. Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * the very select group of Checkusers can see what IP addresses you have used. I'm certain those two accounts are the same user, I'm not so sure about your ties to them, due to the increased gap, although the timing is very suspicious. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;   Discuss  19:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Additionally, I looked at those time stamps. I ceased my activity because I needed to get some sleep. Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your investigation friend. If there was "sock puppetry" occurring, efforts like yours prove valuable. I'm sorry I can't help you further since I'm not sure what Checkusers does. Hopefully some automated bot can solve this riddle for you Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * looking at your timecard, that does seem plausible, although bear in mind that we have no way of knowing what your timezone is (except through a checkuser). You claim on your user page to be in Phoenix (UTC-7), so please remember that all these times are in UTC. The time in question is a time of reduced activity for you, but you have edited at, and even . So, plausible, but not conclusive. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;   Discuss  19:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Well, if it helps any, I specifically live in Tempe AZ. I just moved back here last week, hence my recent edit on that bio page. :) Sure, it's hot in the summer, but it's cheap and clean. Haha I digress. Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 has checked, as you can see below, and you're in the clear. Sorry about that, although I think the two new accounts are likely to be blocked by the DUCK test. Generally when I see that, there's an older account behind it, although not always. Incidentally, I actually have Phoenix on my weather app, so I know how hot it gets in summer (and I must admit, I'm a bit envious!). &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;   Discuss  21:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * @Bell, No harm, no foul. I respect your work. Feel free to come visit. I know a great church in Phoenix. Haha Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping as Coach's didn't go through. -- The SandDoctor Talk 10:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Coachbricewilliams' willingness to cooperate gives me enough reason to doubt what otherwise looks like an open and shut case. Please check to confirm. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Close with no action. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)