Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cobbsaladin/Archive

08 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users produced user pages practically identical to my own except with their own alleged personal (and more than likely false) identifying material in place of my own. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 12:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Okay, these three are ✅:

Those three are ❌ to Cobbsaladin. However, Cobbsaladin IS ✅ to the following three accounts:

Courcelles 19:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * For this case, I've blocked the master account for a week and took care of the socks. I've spun off the second set of accounts into a new SPI case here. Mike V • Talk 19:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

16 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User name is way too similar, first major edit is to oppose an AFD I started. May be retaliatory. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 04:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Investigation is unwarranted. No overlap in posting history between these two accounts and no indication of block/ban evasion. Egg Saladin  04:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't think there's enough evidence right now to endorse a check. I also don't see how the AfD comment proves that this is a sock of the master. If you want, you can tag the account with the SPA template on the AfD. For now, I'd recommend that you keep an eye on the account and re-report if it becomes more clear. Mike V • Talk 16:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * . The name alone here was proof something smelled rotten in Denmark.  And, indeed, ✅. Courcelles 03:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Master indef, sock . ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)