Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cobretti1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Continuing to edit war to insert birthdates using ancestry.com and census birth index violating WP:BLPPRIMARY. Similar diffs and

Switched to the IP address to revert an administrator after several warnings on talk page. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Followup reverts in same article as Cobretti. IP address has also been reported to AIV after continuing to revert after final warning and blocked. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Perhaps I'm overly optimistic, however I've left a final warning. Though the reserve of good faith is now empty; even the slightest hint of a continuation of this behaviour and please re-report here (or to AIV with a link here if it's blatantly disruptive) and a block should rapidly follow. --Jack Frost (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Original account blocked for continued WP:BLPPRIMARY violations. IP address has been blocked for the same issue and shares the same ip range as a previous suspected sockpuppet, 99.245.160.201. Raeliak makes 1 edit on the same issue. They all edit the same article with same sources. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - based on the reported diffs, and timing, I think this is more than plausible. But given that Raeliak has a single edit, I'm second guessing. Requesting a check. MarioGom (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * While I'll admit the behavioral evidence is compelling, CU says at best. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The timing and change are certainly interesting, but considering the CU result, Raeliak using the VE, the different citation style, and citing Ancestry.com rather than then 1950 census, factored in with the account only making one edit (so far), I'm . DatGuyTalkContribs 09:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)