Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cognoscerapo/Archive

07 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

was blocked by for "disruptive editing". An hour later, was created and proceeded to respond to Cognoscerapo's block notice and vandalize the blocking admin's userpage. tagged Cannot be detected's userpage as a suspected sock of, but it seems more likely that this is Cognoscerapo. Cannot be detected is already blocked indefinitely, but it's probably a good idea to do a CU to confirm who the master is. If it's Cognoscerapo, then they're WP:EVADEing their block so further administrative action against them might be necessary. TDL (talk) 03:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


 * This edit, by an IP that has alluded to being Evlekis and blocked as such, and this edit by Evlekis, supports that conclusion. TDL (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - due to the potential of this being a LTA. Rschen7754 10:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Cognoscerapo is a ✅ sock of Evlekis, but Cannot be detected is to be Sinbad Barron . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I've tagged both and extended Cognoscerapo's block to indef. Cannot be detected was already blocked indef. I've copied this section to the SPI archives of Evlekis and Sinbad Barron. I suggest this be redirected to Evlekis' SPI now. Closing. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * After looking back over the evidence, it appears that I was mistaken about Cannot be detected. Actually, that account is more likely to be another Evlekis sock after all. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've fixed the sections that were merged to the other two reports and an IP fixed the tag on CBD. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)