Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CommanderShinzon/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All of them are blanking the same page and its related AfD. Fei noh a  Talk 19:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Also, Commander Shinzon that cited the same Blomkamp post on Twitter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Command Shinzon: ,
 * 2601:646:8103:881E:E8BD:454E:B4BF:E08D IP:
 * 2601:646:8103:881E:5844:C23C:0C06:1150 IP:

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This user does not deny using those IPs (see ). This is not really sockpuppetry. But, since the IP range is blocked for 60 hours for vandalism, I'm applying the same block to the master.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Basically, it's a duck. It's the same blanking based on a refusal to accept that a Twitter post used as a citation was later retracted:, , ,. The IP editor was blocked here at SPI as an admitted sock. See also User talk:CommanderShinzon for more background on this. Also, overlapping interest in the same sports articles:, and ,. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, on my talk page, a reiteration of, same as . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There is other evidence I see indicating SethStewart56 is a sock of CommanderShinzon. Will email if needed, but it probably isn't necessary. This is an obvious duck. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

I found further evidence. All told, the chances are extraordinarily high. Blocked by me just now and tagged. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User claims on Talk:Chappie (film) that the sequel is still in production, citing a message from director Neill Blomkamp. Blomkamp's most recent Twitter post adamantly denies this. This is consistent with the other socks' behavior (Exhibit A). Also note the similar user name. This is their only edit so far but it says a lot. Crboyer (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * patrolling per a request on my talk page. This WP:DUCK is already blocked and tagged, so I'm just flipping the switch here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK. To be honest, I wasn't sure whether it would be more appropriate to report here or WP:AIV given the amount of disruption this person has caused. Sro23 (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Admits it on userpage, under aliases: Sro23 (talk) 02:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, please block. , is it worth mass-reverting this guy's edits? Thanks, GABgab 04:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 06:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See this edit to Chappie (film) which blanked information about the non-existent sequel. See also the editor interaction analyser with other recent socks:. Almost 30 pages in common. Sro23 (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Rather obvious, please block. Thanks, GABgab 02:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Account blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Tagged and closing. GABgab 03:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created article on Chappie 2: Trappist-1. Sro23 (talk) 18:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Also, article deleted. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)