Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Consettlad/Archive

08 October 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All accounts except for Chesterlestreet have exclusively been supporting a hoax section at the article Consett. Please see their edit histories, the discussion at Talk:Consett and WP:ANI. While the quacking is already loud I'd like to see a CU result to distinguish between socks and meatpuppetry. PitYacker2 has already been blocked for username issues regarding but the editing of these was totally contrary so PitYacker2 is clearly a member of this sock farm.

Consettlad was the first to introduce the relevant section and has only made one other edit on that topic; looks a bit like an SPA. Chesterlestreet has been restoring the hoax several times but I would think this was done in good faith. A CU should reveal the truth. De728631 (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * - to sort meats from socks.

is. Otherwise, all listed accounts are ✅ matches to each other. Didn't find any other accounts. Elockid  ( Talk ) 23:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Moved casename to Consettlad as oldest account based on similarity, blocking master 1 week and indeffing socks with tags and closing.