Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coolio12/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * 2010-03 (repl sect w "GOD GOT PISSED")
 * 2010-02 (repl sect w apparent boast)
 * 2010-02 (indef'd for v with faux facts)
 * 2010-02 (similar to 155)
 * 2010-01 (attack)
 * 2009-12 (nonsense words)
 * 2009-09 (v inserting silliness)
 * 2009-06 (child abuse)
 * 2009-02 (urinal silliness)
 * 2008-10 (repl article section w commentary)
 * 2008-10 (odd v)
 * 2008-09
 * 2008-08
 * 2008-08
 * 2008-07
 * 2008-07
 * 2008-07
 * 2008-06
 * 2008-06
 * 2008-05
 * 2008-05
 * 2008-04
 * 2008-04
 * 2008-04
 * 2008-03
 * 2008-03
 * 2008-02
 * 2008-02
 * 2008-02
 * 2008-02
 * 2008-01
 * 2007-12
 * 2007-12
 * 2007-12
 * 2007-10
 * 2007-09
 * 2007-09
 * 2007-08
 * 2007-08
 * 2007-07
 * 2007-07
 * 2007-06
 * 2007-05
 * 2007-12
 * 2007-07
 * 2007-06
 * 2007-05
 * 2007-05
 * 2007-05
 * 2007-05
 * 2007-05
 * 2007-03
 * 2007-03 (pagemove attack didn't get blocked)
 * 2007-03 (blocked for attacks)
 * 2007-03 (sex references in elementary school article)
 * 2007-03 ("it sucks balls")
 * 2007-03 (small changes in band articles)
 * 2007-02 (spamlink)
 * 2007-02 (spamlink)
 * 2007-01 (fanboy)
 * 2006-11 (attack)
 * 2006-11 (user talk unblock req re user:Giant Douchebag a.k.a Jon O.
 * 2006-10 (commentary, bad spelling)
 * 2006-10 (child molestation)
 * 2006-09 (commentary)
 * 2006-08 (attack)
 * 2006-08 (literate, inserted fiction into spider articles)
 * 2006-05 (attack, boast)
 * 2006-02 (blank/replace w attack)
 * 2005-12
 * 2005-03


 * 2008-11 (possibly gf)
 * 2008-11 (not v)
 * 2009-03 (not v)
 * 2009-06 (gangs in Montreal, poss not v)
 * 2009-03 (not v)
 * 2009-07 (redundant insertion, possibly in error)
 * 2009-10 (not vandal)
 * 2009-10 (not vandal)


 * 2007-03 (only one userpage edit)
 * 2006-07 (tests own userpage)
 * 2006-04 not vandal
 * not vandal

Evidence submitted by LeadSongDog
User:LeadSongDog come howl  19:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I may not have them all, but nearly all the above are throwaways, used for at most a few weeks, usually just a day or two.
 * Most vandalize video game or celebrity articles with partial blanking or inserted obscenity or slanders
 * Rarely any edit comment except occasional misdirection
 * Unfortunately given the number of such I can't be completely certain I haven't included any innocents
 * Many other usernames starting with "Coolio" are probably connected, I only went for the purely numeric ones
 * Most of the numeric suffixes are successive numerals in increasing or decreasing order
 * Coolio245678 is recently active


 * I can't understand the cursory dismissal below. As far as I can see, the above are all vandals. Surely if they were different editors there would be a few constructive edits among all those accounts. Please take a closer look. User:LeadSongDog come howl  06:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I see no indication that these accounts are linked in any way aside from naming. Given that Coolio is not only alive, but is also a phrase used, I see no reason for any action. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 22:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)