Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coolvipcandy/Archive

15 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Very similar pattern of editing. Other account purely to contest deletion. Investigation by autoblock could be the way to go. Jamesx12345 19:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Its not the same person but the person in the same room using the same Wi-Fi connection. In accordance with wiki rules that the creator of an article cannot himself remove flag, another user working for same organization and living together (room mates), thus having full knowledge of the discussed topic/article is thus helping in resolving the understanding/presentation of the article. It is about the historic event about how a single person stood against the government and made the difference and with recruitment of thousands of doctors (1268 to be specific), helped saving many many lives. If it is still against the rules, I do apologise and promise not to repeat the same. But please review our article, it does seem like hurried judgements on your part. Please take some time to view the references and sources to verify the authenticity. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rvopunjab (talk • contribs) 19:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * That would seem to be what is called Meatpuppetry, which is indeed against the rules, but since you are openly admitting it and apologising I hope the closing admin will take that into account. Please don't do it again, though. Many thanks. Jamesx12345 20:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This report is now entirely stale. Jamesx12345 15:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closed, per above, with no action taken. Please read our policy on off-wiki collaboration, however. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)