Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cpragency/Archive

Report date August 11 2009, 22:46 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by MuZemike

Consistent removal of "Criticism" information and/or whitewashing, past 3RR, at Denzil Douglas; see history. MuZemike 22:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by MuZemike 22:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Requesting CheckUser as I strongly suspect the usage of (possibly open) proxies to get around 3RR. I also think that at least one of these IPs belong to the registered account. MuZemike 22:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe that even a trainee clerk is allowed to self endorse your own cases per Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerk and checkuser procedures, so I am marking this as Self-Endorsed. NW ( Talk ) 01:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

This is a new user (created today) who was trying to edit an article which is a complete BLP mess, replete with OR criticisms (see Talk:Denzil Douglas. What this person needed was an explanation of how we work, and a gentle push in the direction of OTRS. Even if this was open sockpuppetry, I think this was more out of ignorance and frustration than malice, and would not have blocked the user anyway, so I do not see the need for the CU either. -- Avi (talk) 04:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Marking for closing per Avi's statement. NW ( Talk ) 00:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)