Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crashingthewaves/Archive

Report date April 6 2009, 04:38 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets



Previously blocked

It's for all to see in the archives: the vernacular, action on the same article, wild and unsubstantiated accusations, complete disregard for discussion, page-moving disruption and the trolling suggests to me a strong likelihood of yet another sockpuppet account of. The editor is currently blocked for making an out of process page move (third instance). An earlier checkuser, failed to find the puppetmaster.
 * Evidence submitted by Ohconfucius (talk)

Ohconfucius (talk) 04:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * CheckUser request


 * - Self endorsing this case as evidence shows that CheckUser is needed here. Tiptoety  talk 20:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

IPs blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * moved to master account per instructions Mayalld (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I have generated a report for this case.  Syn  ergy 16:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * ✅ the following as Upgrade1:


 * Confirmed accounts blocked (indef) and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 22:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Fuhghettaboutit
A common thread of some of the sockpuppets below was a campaign to retitle 2008 Beijing Drum Tower stabbings, claiming that "stabbings" in the title was biased and barbarous and the desire to replace it with a euphemism. A move war occurred which I short circuited with blocks and protection. Today 4challengingt appeared at the article's talk page making a familiar move request claiming bias in the title and other matters reminiscent of claims made previously by those below and relying on the very disruption the sockpuppets caused as a ground for finding that there was past support for the move having been faulty. The edits appear to me to quack, but given the passage of time, I think a check is in order. Diff of current move request. See previous evidence below for similar requests and posts about the bias of the title claimed.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * noting that this is SpitfireTally-ho! 16:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Tiptoety  talk 20:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)