Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Creepy Lobster/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Creepy Lobster says "I am a reliable source". DukeofLancaster95 makes the exact same claim, "I am a reliable source". The Editor Interaction Analyser is almost total. Both are focused around incels (e.g. Creepy Lobster vs DukeofLancaster95). Both are editing in the same areas of the pages (e.g. this vs this). I'd self-endorse for checkuser, but I think this falls into the "blatantly obvious" case. Still, it may be worth using the tools to look for sleepers, so I'm opening this for clerk comments. Note both accounts are already blocked. Yamla (talk) 22:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * They're already blocked, and looking for sleepers doesn't seem worth-while or justified. Not to mention nto applies. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Struck the part about NTO; I had missed that the sock was created only after the master was blocked. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)