Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Csi.ddpm/Archive

11 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both have DDPM in usernames, User talk:Csi.ddpm is advert for DDPM company, and Ddpmgroup's only edit have been promotion on User talk:Csi.ddpm, see here and here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  has 0 edits. What exactly is WP:ILLEGITimate in this use of two accounts?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  18:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Their talk page User talk:Csi.ddpm is an unambiguous advert for the company, and both accounts are being used to promote the company on User talk:Csi.ddpm. Isn't using 2 accounts, both for company promotion, an illegitimate use (although it's not specified on WP:ILLEGIT)? Joseph2302 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Account was not used at all, so there is no sockpuppetry here. Both were blocked because of the promotional usernames anyway. Closing this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:17, 12 April 2015 (UTC)