Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cumanche/Archive

Evidence submitted by Lechonero
This puppet master has repeatedly engaged in an edit war with me on the Genizaro article over usage of the word "Indian", first as user:Cumanche and now as user:Bgalleg. The below evidence indicates an obvious similarity in editing patterns. Also the puppet master requested a username change in 2008 from user:Bgalleg to user:Cumanche which was apparently denied. This obviously links the two usernames. Puppet master also left comments on the Genizaro talk page as an anon user discussing the issue in a way that strongly suggested a connection to these two accounts:

User requested a name change in 2008 clearly linking account names user:Bgalleg and user:Cumanche. User made several edits as user:Bgalleg in 2008 on the Genizaro article. User engaged in an edit war with me on the Genizaro article as user:Cumanche Comments as anon editor on Genizaro talk page User recently resumed the edit war with me as user:Bgalleg
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Lechonero (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Corrected sockpuppet name from "Bgaelleg" to "Bgalleg" which appeared to be intended Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This was my mistake. The account name is spelled Bgalleg not Baelleg. Lechonero (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * - I see very specific similarities between Cumanche and Bgalleg. No comment expected from the IPs, but behavioral evidence combined with CU evidence on the two users may be sufficient to close the case. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I take this back. After re-reviewing the evidence, I feel this is sufficient for a WP:DUCK block. There are too many similarities across all. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked Bgalleg indef. Leaving Cumanche unblocked on final warning due to lack of recent edits. Any further socks should lead to a block. Also leaving the IPs alone as they are likely shared and have not been used for a significant amount of time. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)