Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cutlerowns19/Archive

Report date April 1 2009, 00:44 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * Previously confirmed
 * Previously confirmed


 * Evidence submitted by Sheepeh (talk)
 * In their contributions Special:Contributions/Cutlerownsagain and Special:Contributions/Rwiki19 both have tried to add monobook.css, but if checked, the IP's should be matched. The both of the accounts have left similar messages on my talk page, and one sockpuppet User:Cutlerownsagain has already been linked to the other Cutler account.


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Sheepeh (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

per WP:DUCK Mayalld (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Could you please provide more evidence in the form of differences supporting your allegations? If no evidence if forthcoming the case will be closed. KnightLago (talk) 17:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

--Per WP:DUCK and almost exact behavioural instincts, I have blocked the remaining account and tagged the sockmaster. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 04:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date April 13 2009, 17:57 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Confirmed sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/

Further evidence can be seen by simply comparing the sorts of edits being made by each account. I believe a CU is necessary to root out other potential socks (such as the admitted ) as this user has shown a willingness to continue evading his/her blocks. Furthermore, considering Cutlerowns19's first and second edits, this user is likely related to previous users involved in Articles for deletion/Leuricy. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 17:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Rwiki19 was blocked on 3 April, and approx. 19 hours later Rockiesfan19 was registered
 * Rockiesfan19's first edit was to add Twinkle to his/her monobook.js, much like Rwiki19's second edit
 * Both Rwiki19 and Rockiesfan19 engaged in "unusual" article taggings, such as using on stub articles (rockiesfan19, rwiki19)
 * Shortly after being warned for unusual behavior, both Rwiki19 and Rockiesfan19 blanked their respective monobook.js (rwiki19, rockiesfan19), only to re-add it some time later and resume the same unusual behavior.
 * Upon being accused of disruptive behavior, both Rwiki19 and Rockiesfan19 claim innocence and blame "other users" of a shared computer (rwiki19, rockiesfan19)
 * Rockiesfan19 accuses HalfShadow of sockpuppetry, curiously suggesting that Rwiki19 is an alternative account of HalfShadow


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 17:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Case is ripe for a DUCK block, I suspect Rockiesfan19 will be indef'd before long in any case and sleeper socks don't appear to be the MO for the suspected sockmaster. Avruch  T 18:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * indef blocked. Tiptoety  talk 19:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)