Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D.Pearson/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

blocked Deep.Earson as a CU block, but didn't list the account. That account's only edit was to post this on User talk:K.e.coffman. I'm unfamiliar with the exact situation, but this account also seems to be obsessed with Morty. and harassed K.e.coffman as their first edit. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * , pinging you since you seem to be cleaning up after this users mess. Seems like a duck, the main reason I requested CU was to see if there were any other sleepers. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, Bbb23, I just left him a note on his talk page re: the SPI. Not sure if you all want to tag under this account name for the master or not. Thanks for the responseTonyBallioni (talk) 22:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note, this user has been tagged as a sock related to Sockpuppet investigations/D.H.110, so it should probably be confirmed as such and merged if that is the case. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
When I blocked the account, I remember there were already a bunch of other similar accounts blocked by other administrators. I don't think anyone took the trouble to figure out who the oldest account was or tagged any but can't remember for sure. I believe there was another pepe.* account as well blocked by someone. They are all, uh, "obsessed with Morty", and many of their edits were rev/del'd by administrators. Indeed, I think that's how I came across it in the first instance. I can run another check (the listed account is new so probably wasn't there at the time I ran the first check), but, regardless, I'm blocking the account.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * beat me to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * - If it's not too much to ask, please check for other unblocked accounts and/or sleepers. Thanks, GABgab 22:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Please determine the oldest account, move the case, and tag.
 * These accounts are ❌ to . I can see the confusion because of the usernames, all the pepes and earsons, but they are separate masters editing from different continents and using different other technical data. I don't know why this person is mimicking the other.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 22:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please determine the oldest account, move the case, and tag.
 * These accounts are ❌ to . I can see the confusion because of the usernames, all the pepes and earsons, but they are separate masters editing from different continents and using different other technical data. I don't know why this person is mimicking the other.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 22:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please determine the oldest account, move the case, and tag.
 * These accounts are ❌ to . I can see the confusion because of the usernames, all the pepes and earsons, but they are separate masters editing from different continents and using different other technical data. I don't know why this person is mimicking the other.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 22:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please determine the oldest account, move the case, and tag.
 * These accounts are ❌ to . I can see the confusion because of the usernames, all the pepes and earsons, but they are separate masters editing from different continents and using different other technical data. I don't know why this person is mimicking the other.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 22:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * These accounts are ❌ to . I can see the confusion because of the usernames, all the pepes and earsons, but they are separate masters editing from different continents and using different other technical data. I don't know why this person is mimicking the other.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 22:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious similarity in names/targets. I'll do a CU later today or tomorrow if no one beats me to it. Doug Weller talk 16:26, 7 August 2017 (UTC) They all confirm to each other, including the new one. There's an IP at Oathkeepers and its talk page who is possible but not confirmed. Doug Weller talk 17:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

You can add to the list Communist Morty Sucks, which I already blocked. These are all block-on-sight, LTA sockpuppets. It's worth verifying that they are D.H.110, because for a while there was also an imitator doing similar things, named D.Pearson. --MelanieN (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All CU confirmed but these are, not D.H.110. Thanks, User:MelanieN. I guess we'll need a clerk to move this. Doug Weller talk 17:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * This was copied from Sockpuppet investigations/D.H.110. Sro23 (talk) 01:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar name to who was blocked as a sock of D.Pearson. Editing on same page as said sock, restoring their edits. Commented over at Sockpuppet investigations/Cjhard where D.Pearson socks were found.

Requesting CU confirmation and sleeper check  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: this may be Sockpuppet investigations/D.H.110 given their addition of military planes to their user page like past D.H.110 socks did (see, ). The Cjhard case linked above shows the overlap in behavior between D.Pearson and D.H.110.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Note that this account should also be checked against Sockpuppet investigations/D.H.110. We have two different LTA/Sockfarms mimicking each other. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
to determine between sockmasters and flush other accounts. There are three non-stale accounts in the D.H.110 archive. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ to either case. Katietalk 00:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Closing with no action. Sro23 (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same behavior as previous socks, obsessed with attacking/harassing Morty C-137. Deli nk (talk) 13:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC) Deli nk (talk) 13:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Already blocked. Katietalk 00:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * No tag per WP:DENY. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)