Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DARKXRAV3N/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
- Socks share the same naming scheme and writing style in edit summaries - Socks continuously reengage in the same edit war: - Newest sock "XT3RM1N8T0RX": - As X3N0M0RPHX: (one example of many) - As CR1MS0NXV1P3R: (one example of many)

X3N0M0RPHX and CR1MS0NXV1P3R are already confirmed socks of DARKXRAV3N. I bring this here for previous requests to place this on this board YannickFran (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is far too obvious to require CU attention. . Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
- Socks continuously reengage in the same edit war: - Newest sock "W!K!TR0N": - As "XT3RM1N8T0RX": - As X3N0M0RPHX: (one example of many) - As CR1MS0NXV1P3R: (one example of many) YannickFran (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Like previous sockpuppets, this sockpuppet has solely an interest in Apple silicon. The user, like previous sockpuppet, has added the same sort of text to the article; comparing W!K!TR0N's contributions with those of FKDURMOMINDABUTT  make it very behaviorally likely that these are the same user. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)


 * As I was writing this, it appears that the account was indeff'd. That makes this report moot; I think this can be closed as such. Sorry for any trouble this may cause the clerks. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Closing per request, but I think record-keeping is a good enough reason to report here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
- Socks continuously reengage in the same edit war: - New sock J1ZZ-US-MY-SAV10R: - New sock FKDURMOMINDABUTT: - As W!K!TR0N: - As XT3RM1N8T0RX: - As X3N0M0RPHX: (one example of many) - As CR1MS0NXV1P3R: (one example of many)

I have added the same sock previously reported by User Red Tailed Hawk so that it can be flagged as being a sock of DARKXRAV3N. YannickFran (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User is re-engaging for the 8th (6 prior accounts, 1 IP, and now this new account) time over in the same edit war trying to revert the same changes, see previous reports. YannickFran (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ Blocked and tagged Courcelles (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User re-engages in an edit war for which the article Apple silicon has now already been put in edit protection twice. User refused to discuss proposed changes on the talk page in the past and pretends that their various alts aren't them or are "colleagues". YannickFran (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)