Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DBSSURFER/Archive

26 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

As indicated on User talk:Seaboy123, in this edit, user was blocked for edits pertaining to claims about Buddha's birthplace. This correlates to User:DBSSURFER, who claimed in response to his block that he would "continue doing this and even from different users until you guys are disciplined". The editing style, articles edited, and threats of reporting those with whom he disagrees are identical. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 18:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two accounts are ✅ matches to each other. TN X Man 19:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

04 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This user was brought to my attention on my talk page, and after checking through the contribution histories I think there's enough here to merit a check. This user has a very similar editing history and..."style"...to two indef-blocked users: User:RealCowboys and User:Seaboy123, especially on the Football records in Spain article, and with rather vehement accusations that editors who disagree with them are supporters of Barcelona F.C. (RealCowboys: "Anyone else think he's a [Barcelona bandwagoner?]"; Seaboy: "This article is poorly biased towards barcelona"; Amarru: "Once again vandalism by Barcelona fan"). There's enough differences that the quacking is fairly faint, but enough similarities that I believe there should be a check done; as noted, there's similarities to both indef'd editors, but there's slightly more similarities to Seaboy123, IMHO, so I've filed it under the same case as his, although both should likely be checked. The Bushranger One ping only 00:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * as far as DBSSURFER is concerned
 * ✅ as a sock of RealCowboys, definitely ❌ to Amarru
 * ✅ as a sock of RealCowboys, definitely ❌ to Amarru

Socks are already blocked. Nothing more to do here. Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

08 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I have reason to believe that User:HunterSilver is a sockpuppet of User:HasperHunter, who was banned indefinitely on April 20, 2012 for abusing multiple accounts. I have these doubts because User:HunterSilver demonstrate the same, unconstructive behavior at List of Prime Ministers of Nepal as User:HasperHunter did some months ago. I hope this matter will be resolved quickly. Sundostund (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All are already blocked. The  Helpful  One  13:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)