Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DD214/Archive

31 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After DD214 was reverted and warned after beginning to edit war on Paul Rieckhoff, these two newly created accounts showed up to continue to blank out a large section of the article. Looks like a WP:DUCK situation, but a check should be done, IMHO. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  01:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree this needs to be checked. I also think may be him but may be stale for CU purposes.
 * . CU isn't going to tell us anything new. WilliamH (talk) 08:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * . All three indeffed and tagged. No action on Mpc144, which is very stale. AGK  [•] 00:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

04 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same MO as before - BigbonesABC's first (and only, at this time) edit was to blank a large section of Paul Rieckhoff. Doctaocta edits similarly, using identical edit summaries. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * looks like a sock on the other side of the issue as well. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 14:38, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * -  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 14:38, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * and are ✅.
 * is to the above two.
 * is, so don't take this to heart but most likely, ❌
 * and are ✅
 * No sleepers that are immediately obvious. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  17:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged named suspect accounts.