Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DHSULP/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets





 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Almost same pattern of vandalism and use of multiple abusive accounts/ips on Fawad Khan, Waheed Murad, Toilet: Ek Prem Katha, Akshay Kumar filmography, Bhoomi (film), Gold (2018 film), Patiala etc. This user has been accused of sockpuppetry before. Umair Aj (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I am providing more information. Here the diff and  reveals that it is the same person.

These diffs on Waheed Murad predicts the same behavior of sock master. Rest all the articles I mentioned above have same pattern of reverting, using same style and language.-Umair Aj (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Another suspected sock emerged who has just created the account and has the similar style of editing.-Umair Aj (talk) 22:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is connected to Sockpuppet investigations/Barthateslisa.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  21:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I've blocked DHSULP for a week for disruptive editing, and have told them to contact me privately about it. As for the the case here, the extra evidence that's been provided seems circumstantial at best, so I'm closing this case as declined. --Deskana (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)