Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dab2/Archive

11 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

SPA User account created about the same as puppeteer. Both contributed to same article and AfD. Points to puppet. red dog six (talk) 23:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Added Dab2 to the check. Dab2 comments in WP:Articles for deletion/Sara Nelson AFA refer to Unionyes420 as a Admin. This mirrors the comments Unionyes420 has made outside this AfD. red dog six (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ to and .  is very  the same user editing via a now blocked proxy.   As the oldest account  is actually the master and this report should be moved to reflect that. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  18:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

14 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Looks like another puppet. This is an SPA that was created after puppets were tagged and bagged. It appears the user was created to contribute to WP:Articles for deletion/Sara Nelson AFA. The editor has only one other article contribution - the editor claims to be a new; however, the use of CN tags in Seengemai makes that questionable. red dog six (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅, blocked, and tagged. Feel free to strike their AfD !vote.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

20 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Appears to be a SPA created only to !vote for retention of article. User cites argument used by Dab2 as support for "Keep" their argument. Not sure if checkuser is needed for this or not, but I have requested it. red dog six (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The results are, though the edits are highly suspicious with this new editor finding the AfD and casting aspersions on the initiator of the AfD as their first and only edits. If it's not a sock, it would certainly appear to be WP:MEAT (in my opinion).--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked the account for disruption/trolling. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)