Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dallidoman22/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This allegation relates to a number of edits made to the Waltham Abbey (town) page beginning in September. User LondonDorado12 and others have made edits to this page where the description of Waltham Abbey seeks to avoid emphasising that the town is in the county of Essex. In these edits the latter information is either removed from the opening descriptive sentence or in some cases omitted completely. Further, the infobox has been repeatedly edited so that the 'Region' field says 'London' rather than the correct 'East of England'. It has also been claimed that the London postcode E4 covers part of Waltham Abbey, which is untrue. This pattern began on 25 September, with | this edit by user Dallidoman22. The | next edit, made by user Droo11s, was innocuous. (But please take note that one of only two other edits by Droos11s, made to the Waltham Abbey F.C. page, | included an alteration to say that Waltham Abbey is in London.) Following my edit of the Waltham Abbey (town) page on 28 September, user Davidmiles122 stepped in on 1 October to revert to | omitting Essex from the opening sentence. I undid the Davidmiles122 edit, but was then | reverted by LondonDorado12. After I | challenged LondonDorado12 on their talk page, they | grudgingly | restored mention of Essex. Then, on 14 October, user Sdaa2 | edited the infobox 'Region' field to say 'London' instead of 'East of England'. The next change was on 4 December, when user A1P2E3 | altered the opening sentence to once again omit mention of Essex. On 5 December I undid this edit as well as altering the infobox 'Region' field to say 'East of England' instead of 'London'. However, on 9 December, user Silamosam | effectively undid my changes and significantly also added the London postcode E4 to the postcodes listed in the infobox. I reverted these changes by Silamosam on 10 December, but the same day | the region field was altered back to briefly say 'London', this time by a non-registered IP editor. Later on 10 December, LondonDorado12 | reverted to Silamosam's version, saying that I was wrong about the E4 postcode. I reverted this but was myself reverted by LondonDorado12. At this point I decided to alert administrator AnemoneProjectors to what was going on. Subsequently, having reverted AnemoneProjectors' edits, LondonDorado12 was warned about edit-warring and has made no further edits. But user Sircatosam | altered the infobox 'Region' field to say 'London'.

In summary, I suspect that the following accounts may all be linked: LondonDorado12, Dallidoman22, Droo11s, Davidmiles122, Sdaa2, A1P2E3, Silamosam, Sircatosam. The IP address 79.69.224.148 may also be significant. My assumption was that LondonDorado12 is the 'master' account but I guess there could be some other account-holder who has created all these accounts and LondonDorado12 could itself be a sock. Dubmill (talk) 13:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ + . Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This IP has suddenly made a large number of edits reintroducing incorrect information about towns in Essex and Hertfordshire but just outside London. The latter edits are exactly like those of Dallidoman22 and associated accounts. NB IP has also undone a number of my edits on unrelated topics. Clearly trolling or vindictive. I tried undoing some of the edits but IP keeps reverting them. Prior to this sequence of edits, IP only made one edit, in 2015. Dubmill (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
We don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No more edits from this IP. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)