Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Damotclese/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Damotclese: states that use of word disgraced is "unprofessional";  makes the same claim. Davijee has no edits other than promoting Wakefield, which was the last thing Damotclese was doing prior to blocking. Guy (Help!) 09:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * - In light of the CU result, this could go either way. I'd like to see what they do upon becoming autoconfirmed before making a decision. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Between the CU result, the edit summaries, and their writing style, I'm inclined to think this someone else. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same interest in Pacific trails, incredibly similar user pages - Damotclese before replacement with Sock tag, AlsoMostlyHarmless now. Same list of areas of knowledge, same formatting, etc.  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Added CU request as this editor has historically used multiple, simultaneous interactive accounts in mutual support in the past, and

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. No other accounts seen. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)