Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DanaTodd/Archive

11 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts have been repeatedly reverting reliably sourced, but unfavorable information on Bio Recovery Corporation, such as here:, ,. They also have only edited similar pages: National Crime Scene Clean Up Association and Crime scene cleanup. mikeman67 (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Before this is closed, I'd like to request that someone take a look at whether User:PhilCA612 is also another sockpuppet. Behaviour is very similar to these other accounts and the account has been active on the same pages. I accidentally missed this account in my original comment. mikeman67 (talk) 02:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - to compare the two based on provided diffs.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * The accounts have been blocked and tagged with the listed master. However, the following accounts are but obviously behaviorally connected:
 * (blocked)
 * (blocked)
 * (unblocked)
 * If a clerk wants to make the oldest of the three the master, then the accounts should be retagged accordingly. If not, the case can be closed.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In response to the filer's adding PhilCA612, I checked that account at the same time as the others. It wasn't listed, of course, but I checked other accounts that I noticed in the history of some of the articles on my own initiative. The account is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All accounts blocked and tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk 03:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I moved the case to the name of the oldest account and retagged.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In response to the filer's adding PhilCA612, I checked that account at the same time as the others. It wasn't listed, of course, but I checked other accounts that I noticed in the history of some of the articles on my own initiative. The account is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All accounts blocked and tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk 03:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I moved the case to the name of the oldest account and retagged.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)