Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daniel C. Boyer/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Daniel C. Boyer was blocked for, among other things, self-promotion. This IP is adding and aggressively restoring bland art images attributed to Daniel C. Boyer. (see also Articles for deletion/Daniel C. Boyer) Most of the IPs listed at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Daniel C. Boyer engage in similar behavior. Grayfell (talk) 23:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits to Perspiration, , and Drawing ,  make it abundantly clear that this is Boyer, who socked frequently before and after his ban. In particular, the IP's edit to Perspiration is virtually indistinguishable from Boyer's earlier one, with the exception that Boyer's name has been omitted, because an Edit Filter prevents his name from being used in an edit. (Boyer's topic ban and later site ban  were based in large part on his inserting his non-notable name into various articles, using both his own account and various socks.)  Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This edit to Marmalade is an old Boyer topic as well, the use of marmalade in art. Those edits were all done by numerous socks (see edit history of Marmalade). This edit was done with a NY Public Library IP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * List of the articles Boyer favors here. I have this watchlisted, as does, I believe. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Unquestionably it's him again. EEng 23:22, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Cyberpower678 reports on User talk:Daniel C. Boyer "IP range /50 blocked", so I think this can be archived. I apologize to our Checkusers and SPI clerks, as I should have thought of going to Cyberpower before I filed this report. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Banned PROMOer, his usual articles. EEng 22:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
See, , and. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Who knew that I still had this case on my watchlist. Blocked for a year.  If someone else gets allocated this IP range, they can make an unblock request.  It seems pretty static. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)