Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DanielaNES/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
I was patrolling new pages when I came cross Chapel of Saint-Jean du Liget article. I left a note on DanielaNES's talkpage regarding some copyedit/style issues of the article. A couple of days later, I found the same issues in Saint-Nazaire de Barbadell church article. This time instead of fixing style/copyedit issues I tagged the page. They manually untagged it but I undid their edit. Yesterday to my surprise, I saw the above mentioned accounts making the same mistakes. It is unlikely three different accounts making identical mistakes to be circumstantial. These are,

Chapel of Saint-Jean du Liget: 1. French related, 2. MOS:LAYOUT disregard: Bibliography first, references next, See also last, 3. References before punctuation marks 4. See also duplicate links in the body.

Southwest Line: 1. French-related 2. References-first, See also second, bibliography last 3. References before punctuations. 4. Duplicate links in see also.

Popular novel in France 1. Another french related article. 2. LAYOUT in Chapel of Saint-Jean du Liget's order 3. References before punctuations 4. See also section contains external links. Chanaka L ( talk ) 09:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All of these editors have disclosed that they are part of the Open Knowledge Association which is a group of people who are paid to translate articles from wikis in other languages. (I think this is a questionable and poorly executed idea but it is not sockpuppetry). The articles in question appear to be translations from the French Wikipedia and the formatting issues are likely a consequence of that. Closing without further action from a SPI perspective; issues with the content of their edits can be brought to another noticeboard if appropriate. Spicy (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)