Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dantetheperuvian/Archive

16 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The user's affinity to provide personal views and even erroneous ones in articles regarding the FIFA Club World Cup and the Toyota Cup led to him being blocked. The slight change in username is highly suspicious. Plus, it seemed this has been going on for year. Hawaiifive0 (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

There is nothing to investigate. That's me. Sadly I can't edit with my count due to problem with the access. Regarding the issue, the references supporting my edits are official documents of UEFA, CONMEBOL and FIFA, the same sources used in this page and accepted by the community in this discussion, but the user Hawaian and something arrogantly ignores. That user insist with his crazy theories and "researchs" as catalog the Intercontinental Cup as "friendly" being actually an UEFA/CSF official competition and recognised with official value by FIFA (though not necessary, both Confederations' statutes, based on the FIFA Statute, give them exclusivity to what organised and it's proven what that tourmanent was organised by both organism). Those are the facts. And frankly, I would not be surprised if that user was actually the puppet of this banned user as edited and written in the same form...--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 11:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed the opening user does look like a couple of the user you've mentioned, so would be a good idea to open a new SO I and request CU. The two accounts are obviously the same but edits seem legit an  a reasons been given above but I thin this would be best linked between the userpages or if one of the accounts was abandoned. Do you need both if you just can't use  one? Jack Stamps (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * "Danteilperuaviano" is my username in it.wiki. As I struggled with this account and I currently have a very limited internet access, I had to use that. IMHO, is very necessary to investigate if the opening user is related with the banned because in the past this was discussed uselessly and is ridiculous that that the same subject sabotaging Wikipedia deleting without reason sourcered official information and, in turn, and, in turn, intended as this article, actually biased deliberately against this argument becomes featured.--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 18:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Given the statement from Dante and the absence of any inappropriate behavior, I'm willing to assume good faith here. I've added a template to his sock account to link the two accounts and will be closing this case with no action taken. Mike V  •  Talk  22:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)