Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dantrevisani/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious fact that the master shares the name with the primary focus of the puppets editing focus. The current account in use has an apparent unwillingness to abide by COI policies and requests by other editors to request change to related articles on the talk page. Instead they continue to See also this thread at the teahouse where they claim to be Trevisani

The three accounts that I have included serve no other purpose than to ref-spam for Trevisani.
 * to Intercultural communication followed by.
 * at Communication and.
 * at Skill and.
 * and  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Out of hundreds of contributions, most of whom not dealing with me or my work, you look very carefully about references to published works. I think you identified the wrong enemy. I also think that I proudly endorse the words of Jimmy Wales: "Expert editors are important to Wikipedia". Jimmy Wales, a founder of Wikipedia, here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Expert_editors. And if it happens that expert editors write on topics on which they have also published, don't you see the contradiction? How can one be expert and not have a publication on the topic on which he/she should be extremely expert. Where is the point in attacking book authors? Where does it lead? How does Wikipedia benefit from attacking book authors when they make a contribution in which a part, and only a part, of that contribution is from a published or edited book? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Culturalresearch (talk • contribs) 15:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dantrevisani is of course.
 * Culturalresearch and Explorerplainstone are to each other. Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Tagged, closing. GABgab 15:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)