Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dareblock/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Brock performed a page move that was contested and proceeded to a Requested Move discussion. These SPAs quickly popped up to support him in the discussion. The situation was reported at ANI and it appears to be sockpuppetry to me, but the SPAs could theoretically just be fans of the article's subject&mdash;the page gets a good number of daily views. S warm  ♠  14:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Not necessarily sockpuppetry, but very likely meatpuppetry per WP:QUACK. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please check to confirm vote-stacking. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Dareblock and Bowstires are ✅. Brocklovesgreys is ❌. Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A fan is not the same as meat and should not be blocked for that reason.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)