Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Davenbelle/Archive

16 May 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets

This edit  — Jeff G. ツ 21:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by  — Jeff G. ツ
 * See also Requests for arbitration/Moby Dick.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

true enough, and there are moar ;)

<span style="white-space: nowrap; background-color: #eee; background: -moz-radial-gradient(bottom right 90deg, farthest-side, #999, #eee); border: 1px solid #999; border-radius: 0.5em; -moz-border-radius: 0.5em; -webkit-border-radius: 0.5em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); display: inline-block; margin: 0.5em 0; padding: 0.5em 0.8em 0.5em; font-variant: small-caps;" title="“Bollocks to the rules!”">— Sincerely, Street-Legal Sockpuppet Jack Merridew   21:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by other users
 * Close this posthaste, please. This is old news and not actionable. ÷seresin 21:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Davenbelle is an former sockpuppeteer. He is now using the username 'Jack Merridew'. He has been unblocked per the direction of the Arbitration Committee. User:Jack Merridew/History explains more. NW ( Talk ) 21:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

4 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets



Auto-generated every hour. Similar name to one of the socks. Posted a barnstar here at User talk:Br'er Rabbit, a Davenbelle sock. Please see this suspected sock's talk page where he says he's not a sock, but rather an old friend. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Editor interaction utility

Evidence for Jumbo willy per this. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

There is absolutely no way that either of those two accounts bear any sort of behavioural relationship to the editing of Davenbelle, Jack Merridew, etc. Nobody looking at Jumbo willy's immature contribution history could possibly confuse that with Jack's editing. Somebody's muddying the waters, but it's very unlikely to be Jack. --RexxS (talk) 21:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)