Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dbpjmuf/Archive

13 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Exact same edit Dbpjmuf who is serving a two week block. IP edit and exact same action by Dbpjmuf before block. dwc lr (talk) 22:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked 2 weeks. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

25 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts have recently been making the same overlapping, anti-royalty edits on royal bio articles, e.g.

by Clumpytree and by Dbpjmuf

by 79.97.144.17 and by Dbpjmuf

by Dbpjmuf and by 79.97.144.17.

by Dbpjmuf and by 79.97.144.17

by 79.97.144.17 and by Dbpjmuf FactStraight (talk) 09:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Both 79.97.144.17 and Dbpjmuf are warring in article Prince Ernst August of Hanover (born 1954)], about same issue. Even as it was explained to him by three editors (DWC LR, FactStraight and me), that he was wrong, he only began edit warring as IP, probably for "anonymity". He was blocked for edit warring three times and now is again reported at [[WP:AN3. Thank you for our consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yopie (talk • contribs)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clumpytree is for checkuser purposes and checkusers generally do not disclose connections between IPs and named accounts. TN X Man 14:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Since this case was opened, Clumpytree has woken up again. Endorsing to see what's up. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ that the IP is exactly what it appears to be.  that Clumpytree is Dbpjmuf, ✅ that Steven5432 is a sleeper of Dbpjmuf.  Behavioral evidence must be relied upon in the Clumpytree vs. Dbpjmuf connection. Jclemens (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on the CU results and behavioral evidence, I've blocked Clumpytree as a sock. I've also blocked Steven5432. And I've blocked the master for a week. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I am clumpytree, I am not a puppet of anyone else. Please let me know what I can do to unblock my account. 128.40.80.164 (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I've re-checked and am inclined to say that a technical link is very much but that the behavioural evidence (especially his edit summary usage, writing style, and overlap of contributions) makes this a rather obvious link. I've declined the unblock request.  AGK  [&bull; ] 18:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

18 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Evading block to do same or similar edits as previous socks he's used: repeatedly editing bios and articles related to nobility & royalty to reflect his POV that the subjects are not genuinely noble or deserve to be minimized, as seen below: for 87v7t76fc4iguwevf7657436253yd4fug754ws67dtfugiy67t8576, see here (compare to Dbpjmuf), here, here, here and here). For 89.100.150.198, see here, here, here and here. Compare these to pre-block edits of Dbpjmuf or his socks (e.g. Clumpytree, 79.97.144.17), below: Clumpytree and Dbpjmuf and 79.97.144.17 and Dbpjmuf FactStraight (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * So uh, Dbpjmuf actually requested to change their username to that long string, and it was granted. Since then the account hasn't edited at all, but the IP has. I've left a note on the IP's talk page to log in. I'm assuming a lot of good faith on this one, but there's not much overlap in edits between the named accounts and the IP. Relist if necessary.. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:29, 18 September 2011 (UTC)