Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delzem/Archive

27 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users added the same spam link to Continuous positive airway pressure with a misleading edit summary. One of them used a fake "reFill" edit summary, which I've seen another recent spammer use (, who could also be checked if the evidence is sufficient). I'm requesting a checkuser in case there's a farm. KateWishing (talk) 19:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those two accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * . This has all the earmarks of paid editing, which means the check will take longer. I might finish today but probably not. Gotta eat after all and relax a bit off-wiki after dinner.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Group 1 – The following accounts are ✅:
 * Group 2 – The following accounts are ✅ and between and  to Group 1:
 * Group 3 – The following accounts are ✅ and probably ❌ to Groups 1 and 2:
 * I’ve blocked all of the accounts and tagged none. I’ll leave it up to the clerk whether to tag them here, not tag some or any, or create other SPI(s) for one or both of Groups 2 and 3.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged group 1 as confirmed. I don't think others need to be tagged. I also do not think that we need a separate SPI page, as the behavioral evidence clearly connects them.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – The following accounts are ✅ and probably ❌ to Groups 1 and 2:
 * I’ve blocked all of the accounts and tagged none. I’ll leave it up to the clerk whether to tag them here, not tag some or any, or create other SPI(s) for one or both of Groups 2 and 3.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged group 1 as confirmed. I don't think others need to be tagged. I also do not think that we need a separate SPI page, as the behavioral evidence clearly connects them.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – The following accounts are ✅ and probably ❌ to Groups 1 and 2:
 * I’ve blocked all of the accounts and tagged none. I’ll leave it up to the clerk whether to tag them here, not tag some or any, or create other SPI(s) for one or both of Groups 2 and 3.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged group 1 as confirmed. I don't think others need to be tagged. I also do not think that we need a separate SPI page, as the behavioral evidence clearly connects them.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I’ve blocked all of the accounts and tagged none. I’ll leave it up to the clerk whether to tag them here, not tag some or any, or create other SPI(s) for one or both of Groups 2 and 3.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged group 1 as confirmed. I don't think others need to be tagged. I also do not think that we need a separate SPI page, as the behavioral evidence clearly connects them.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged group 1 as confirmed. I don't think others need to be tagged. I also do not think that we need a separate SPI page, as the behavioral evidence clearly connects them.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)