Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Demirhangiray/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Behavioural, at Ziya Öniş. Obvious name similarity. Both editors have only edited that one article and both editors have been active simultaneously: on 11 March, Demirhangiray1001 at 21:13,  Demirhangiray at  21:17 and then Demirhangiray1001 again at 21:20, both editors placing and replacing the same contested content (see the paragraph beginning "Overall, he is one of the leading social scientists in Turkey" here and here. Note: sockpuppetry is one of several concerns about this editor's contributions; see User talk:discospinster for details and an explanation for why I came to this forum. Dorsetonian (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Obviously a sock. Given that it's a new account, there's no previous block, and there's no attempt at concealing they are the same person (although the usage of a second account for warring is abusive), Demirhangiray1001 should be indef'd. I think an admin should consider whether to also block the master for lack of communication or disruptive editing, or to leave it as a warning. MarioGom (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Because the Demirhangiray1001 account has not edited for several weeks, and because as MarioGom mentioned there appears to be no attempt at concealing they are the same person, I have decided not to block either account. Instead, I've left uw-agf-sock on both user talk pages. Closing with no further action. If the accounts resume disruptive activity, then they should be reported to the relevant noticeboard at that time. Mz7 (talk) 03:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)