Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeniseJZ/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There seems to be an unusual COI, DeniseJZ has been editing only View, Inc. page from 2014. When anyone, (probably they are also another group of puppets User:Kebawl, User:14kawadat, User:Jmplaton,User:Rbammi, User:Dmolanphy, User:Sw.hw.dir, User:CindyMT, User:Electrochromismexpert) tries to edit the page they reverse the edits. One group is trying to promote the company's founder Dr. Paul Nguyen (left company in 2009) and another group are trying to mention the recent products of View. All edits of these two groups have a similar pattern and clearly affiliated. Check all history for the details. Once, I tried to fix the page with more neutral content, creating history section here, they have been again reverted. I have again reversed the edits and see who comes up now.


 * User:Mkrause038, last edit
 * User:DeniseJZ,last edit
 * User:Hel enSS,last edit

Pattern is similar of the two groups and need to do the needful. Sundartripathi (talk) 04:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Vanjagenije, another similar pattern of Ngugen's editors is to warn users not to edit content that is been for the years. The exactly same nature of edits, asking to talk on their user talk page, instead of View's talk page and the similar use of language.


 * DeniseJZ warning users here (Kebawl, can you justify your change of the whole page that's been around from the beginning? Please talk at DeniseJZ to see if we can reach an agreement.)
 * Mkrause038 warning me today (Sundartripathi: please do not replace contents that have been around for years with inaccurate info and for no good reason. Talk at Mkrause038)

Check their edit pattern, both users are experts and edit only View's page (similar tag: Fixed inaccurate info) to promote Paul Nguyen, who was with the company for only initial three years. These user group, ascertain that Nguyen must read as technology inventor of View, however all patents have been filed in 2013 without mentioning him as the inventor, which makes clear he was inventor of the initial technology and not the one developed by View after him. They ascertain a common goal and edit through different accounts, which very depicts a clear COI with Nguyen. Sundartripathi (talk) 18:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare listed account, except HelenSS who is stale.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * to each other and above:
 * Also is ✅ to, , and , which should be logged separately.
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * to each other and above:
 * Also is ✅ to, , and , which should be logged separately.
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Also is ✅ to, , and , which should be logged separately.
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Nick (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Tagged separately and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)