Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Derk23/Archive

01 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

None, asked to do it on my self. Derk23 (talk) 02:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Comment, in the way of clarification, this user has been suspected of possibly being a sock of Informationnest, Spamwatch22 and ScamWatch here, and I suggested they consider requesting an SPI to put those questions aside. Please let me know if this is an inappropriate request--it's what I would have done had I been questioned in a similar manner. --Nuujinn (talk) 02:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Not only was this case not filed for a checkuser, we do not use checkuser to prove innocence; that is impossible. If someone has a problem, they can file a case themselves. Until then, unbased accusations are inappropriate and borderline attacks. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 02:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Closing this case with no action. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 02:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

01 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Always edits article with information uses the word "fate" a lot and always interjects information about J.G. Wentworth's bankruptcy. Does extreme edits to page every few months with different users, recreates new pages in the name of the company with purely negative information, etc. Also uses defamatory personal site http://www.jgw-sucks.com as a reference, adds as link, etc. Mr. Finance (talk) 17:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's hard to make a judgment on this case because of how infrequent it is. There's no malicious sockpuppeting here per se; it's not like the accounts are editing all at the same time. So while I'd say it's likely that all the accounts are the same (or at least similar), I'm going to close this with no action for now. Relist if any of the accounts become active, or if there's any sort of new development. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)