Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deserted Cities/Archive

Evidence submitted by Chuckluck
All users appear to unanimously disagree with ammendments on Jimmy Page page/discussion, not acknowledging reasons why information should be removed or even pointing out reason to have removed, instead reverting back in constantly.... despite concensus from users RazerCrane, Luminifer, DavisHawkens, 202.20.0.166, suggesting changes along these lines- yet the checkuser users don't seem to acknowledge there was reasons too --Chuckluck (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Chuckluck (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

to check on the filer. The very first (and only so far) edit by the filer has been this SPI case. I highly doubt this is a new user and suspect another "Plaxico" going on. MuZemike 21:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
No evidence, behavioral or technical, of sock puppetry. See Sockpuppet investigations/CosmicLegg for confirmed socks of this user, which includes the filer. MuZemike 22:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)